The Power of Electric

Tuesday, May 12, 2009
When Google asked for submissions of a 90 second video on the benefits of plug in cars to show at a 2008 Washington DC Brookings-Google Electric Car conference, Alexandra Paul and Stefano Paris decided to rise to the challenge! With Stefano's friend Gary Winterboer, they shot this video at a local gas station using Alexandra's RAV4-EV and Stefano's EVO. Tom Hanks, who owns 2 electric cars, stopped by the gas station to buy a drink, recognized Alexandra from their Dragnet days, and watched some of the filming. The video was chosen to open up the plug in conference which was described in an October 2008 Washington Post article as follows:
Just four months ago, a conference here on electric cars drew four times as many people as expected. District fire marshals ordered some of the crowd to leave, and the atmosphere was more like that of a rock concert than an energy conference. A brief film depicted an electric car owner driving off with a beautiful woman to the strains of "The Power of Love" while her original companion struggles to pay for gasoline. The audience cheered.
This May 31st marks the 1 year anniversary of the fun "Power of Electric" videoshoot.

   

The Power of Electric

 

2008.06.11 Day 1 Plug-In Conference 1-2pm [Sources] - Alexandra Paul's "Power of Electric" - Stefano Paris's "Power of Electric" video-photoshoot archive - Stefano's archive of the 2008 Brookings-Google Plug-In Conference Webcast - Watch "Power of Electric" open the Plug-In Conference (1st Webcast hour video)

The EV Curveball

Sunday, February 01, 2009
Welcome back to guest blogger Andrew Grin ... 

As a new driver, learning on the roads of Kansas City, I pass by Suburbans and Tahoes on a daily basis. "Who Killed the Electric Car?" made me realize the huge impact that these big SUV’s have on our environment and our country.  The film inspired me then as a young 14 year-old to take a stand against the flawed status quo.  At that moment I made a promise to myself to never call a gas car my own. I have stuck by that promise, and am now the proud owner of a newly converted 2005 Hyundai Tucson electric vehicle. 

The first question anyone asks after turning 16 is 'Did you get your license yet?' - which ultimately leads to 'What kind of car are you driving?'  In the midst of conversations during lunch about engines and audio systems, I like to throw in my curveball : "I drive an electric car."  Some have no clue what I am talking about, while the car junkies have heard of plug-in hybrids like the Chevy Volt. 

The usual questions that follow are "how far?" and "how fast?" Very simply, the Tucson travels far enough for my daily needs (about 50 miles), and it can travel up to highway speeds (75+). I love answering questions, and, after hearing me talk, almost no one doubts the viability of a plug-in car. The Suburbans of my middle American town are going to have to get used to me rolling by in my converted electric car. The future is coming, not only in the form of a sporty Tesla, or any brand new car, but also something for the average America. A converted electric car.

Bright's Plug-In Car: Aerodynamics Are Key

Wednesday, January 28, 2009
This new company, Bright Automotive, is founded by ex-GM EV1 people, and the super efficient Rocky Mountain Institute to make plug-in hybrids in Indiana. Like Paul MacCready's original design for the Impact that established the world's lowest drag coefficient of .195, Bright will be building cars that "do more with less", a philosophy MacCready was famous for (and the title of a wonderful biography on him). It'll be interesting to see how their vehicles compare to all the rest in terms of efficiency. 

At the end of this article, Prof. Andy Frank makes the observation that parallel hybrids (Toyota Prius) are cheaper than series hybrids (Chevy Volt). This runs counter to what I've been led to believe, so since Mr. Frank is on this list, I'm asking him if he'll explain why this is. I'm still not convinced. Paul

Bright Automotive says it soon release an electric car with a 100 mile per gallon plus plug-in – and the company says it will keep the car economically priced.
By Michael Kanellos, for Greentech Media
"The slimming of the battery essentially comes because of a focus on weight, aerodynamics, rolling resistance, new construction materials and other design factors, he said in an interview. By reducing wind resistance and weight, the company's engineers effectively are reducing the amount of work an electric engine will have to perform to get the car up to driving speeds, which in turn conserves battery power."
Here is the full text of the entire article in case the link goes bad: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/think-tanks-plug-in-car-aerodynamics-are-key-5561.html 

Think Tank's Plug-In Car: Aerodynamics Are Key 

How can you quickly improve the performance of the battery in an electric car? Lose weight.

Bright Automotive, which spun out of the Rocky Mountain Institute in January, is building a plug-in hybrid vehicle that will get 100 miles a gallon (see Green Light post). Just as important, Bright is going to try to keep the car economically priced, in part by reducing the size of the battery.

The battery pack in Bright's car, conceivably, could be made 40 percent smaller than the batteries in similar plug-ins, according to CEO John Waters. To date, the relatively high cost of batteries has kept electric and plug-in vehicles at the fringes of the auto industry.

The slimming of the battery essentially comes because of a focus on weight, aerodynamics, rolling resistance, new construction materials and other design factors, he said in an interview. By reducing wind resistance and weight, the company's engineers effectively are reducing the amount of work an electric engine will have to perform to get the car up to driving speeds, which in turn conserves battery power.

"It's a revolutionary platform," he said. "The platform that's been on the road today is 100 years old. [The traditional technique for making cars] uses a lot of steel."

Granted, nearly every other electric car company is trying to increase performance through aerodynamics and new construction materials. Bright will also face the same challenges in raising capital and moving from crafting prototypes to producing commercial vehicles. But it does have experience on its side. Waters worked on the battery for the General Motors EV1 and also worked at Ener1, which makes lithium-ion batteries. Many of the other executives have years of experience in the auto business.

Weight and poor design result in a disproportionate amount of fuel consumption in vehicles, Waters said. The U.S. Post Office operates 162,000 delivery trucks that get around 10 miles per gallon, he said, and these trucks drive around 18 miles a day. If those trucks are put into use 300 working days a year, that's 87.5 million gallons of gas consumed by those white little trucks trolling your neighborhood. Boosting mileage to 100 miles per gallon conceivably could save nearly 80 million gallons of gas.

A one cent increase in the price of fuel raises the operating budget of the federal government by $8 million, Waters said.

"That's a lot of money the federal government is putting into fuel," he said.

Waters wouldn't provide a lot of details on the vehicle. Bright has built a "mule" or concept prototype with a working drive train that it demonstrated to select guests and policy makers in December. In May, the company plans to show off a commercial prototype at the Electronic Vehicle Show in Stavanger, Norway. A commercial release, ideally, could occur three or so years from now.

The car will go 30 miles on batteries before the gas engine kicks in and be street-legal. (Some manufacturers such as Zenn Motor broke into electric cars with limited speed vehicles that top out at 25 or 35 miles per hour.) Together, the gas and electric engines will give the car a 400 mile range, or far farther than the fully electric $109,000 Tesla Roadster.

Although Bright will pursue the mass market, we mostly discussed the delivery vehicle market.

Bright's vehicle will also likely keep the series versus parallel debate alive in the hybrid world. In a series hybrid, the electric engine propels the car down the road. The onboard gas engine largely exists to recharge the batteries for the electric engine. The Chevy Volt is based around a series hybrid design and so is the Karma coming later this year from Fisker Automotive.

The series hybrid architecture, however, is complex, say critics. In a parallel hybrid, both the gas engine and electric engine are used to propel the car. The Prius is a parallel hybrid and Toyota plans to use a parallel hybrid architecture in its first plug-in hybrid. UC Davis professor Andy Frank, the so-called father of the plug-in, has formed a company, called Efficient Drivetrains Inc., that will make components for parallel hybrids (see Green Light post).

"They think [series hybrids are] cheaper but [they] is not. In order to get the same performance, you have to get a much bigger electric motor," Frank said in an interview in August.

Bright is based around a parallel hybrid.